Ladies and Gentlemen,
Yes, we agree that electoral systems differ from country to country but irrespective of
this, the important thing is to ensure that the tools attached to each system is known to
the parties involved and that people have access to these tools.
These tools include financing and access to radio, TV and other media. In South Africa we
have managed to put together an Independent Electoral Commission, but it still has a long
way to go in terms of building infrastructure, especially in rural areas.
However political parties in South Africa have taken note that the playing field is not
level when it comes to certain of these tools, such as access to SABC TV and Radio. It is
simply not acceptable that only one political party receives exclusive live coverage of
partisan and campaign events such as their manifesto launch, especially in 1999 and 2004;
there is a saying "seeing is believing", and when these exclusive broadcasts
occur the nation is glued to their televisions and radios. The impression is not only a
favourable one that is being created for the ruling party, but also a negative one for all
the other parties because voters must surely wonder "Where are they?", "Do
they have nothing to say?"
It is indeed our right as political parties and role-players in shaping the democracy of
South Africa that we should know everything regarding the electoral process and its
management. What criteria are being used for instance in the selection of IT companies
appointed by the IEC? We, all of the role-players, must be allowed to screen these and
other IEC appointments and tenders because the way that BEE has been applied in other
spheres of society it would not be surprising to discover that some of these companies
that win these tenders are headed and/or controlled by "deployed" ruling party
members.
The other electoral tool that must be reviewed is the officials that are used by the IEC
during election periods. It is an open secret in this country that the IEC uses government
employees who are members of COSATU and who are politically aligned to the ruling party.
This raises questions about the fairness of certain processes and decisions during
elections; it is not surprising that some of these officials abuse their position to
frustrate other parties and their agents. In fact some of those officials are leaders of
the ruling party.
Another matter of inequality is the composition of South Africa's IEC Commissioners. In
other countries in Africa and elsewhere the IEC Commissioners are - correctly -
representative of all the political parties; however in South Africa we do not have this
fair and equal treatment.
In South Africa we need a summit of all the role-players to address these issues. If the
IEC, SABC and ICASA cannot tell us in advance what the official position is regarding the
exclusive live coverage for political parties, then a group of political parties should
come together and take the matter to court. This is supposedly a constitutional democracy,
yet we see at times disturbing trends regarding the suppression of alternative views and
the political parties that espouse them. We must soon have such a summit between all
political parties, ICASA, SABC, IEC and other stakeholders to discuss these issues
regarding the weaknesses in our electoral system; we cannot pretend that our electoral
system is perfect and consequently sell our model to the rest of Africa when there remain
major issues that must be resolved in our electoral system.
I thank you.
|